Originally it was perceived as such: She agree’d to let his likeness appear in the game, so what’s wrong? Is she REALLY that drugged up?

Now there are reports that she’s more or less upset about HOW his likeness was used within the game. This refers to the ability to use Kurt Cobain to sing any song in the library, and apparently one of the biggest offenders is having him sing “You Give Love A Bad Name” by Bon Jovi.

Now, as respectfully as I can, I’m gonna call this whole ordeal from Courtney Love and friends probably the stupidest fucking thing I’ve ever heard. Oh well, there goes the “respectfully” part.

Moving on, there was a post on Kotaku [link] discussing this, and it brought up another game called The Beatles: Rock Band.

Now if you read the comments of that article, there are many, MANY points being hit on. A lot of them are valid, a few are just dumb idiot trolls, but a lot of them are in fact, valid. There’s a few points I’d like to bring up though.

First, if Courtney’s Lawyer was good enough, this probably wouldn’t have happened in the first place. However there is no saying that Activision may have blurred the lines a bit. I haven’t seen the legalese behind it all, so I can’t say that with any definity. However, my initial point still stands, even if they did, and Courtney’s Lawyer was good enough, and Ms. Love of mind enough, they would have thought to implement a phrase that limits Cobain’s likeness to singing just his kind of songs (if not just his own.)

Secondly, there was a lot of back and forth about how the new Rock Band game for The Beatles serves as justification (or lack thereof) for how Kurt Cobain is used in Guitar Hero. This is utter stupidity to think that one game, developed for a completely different reason, can or would serve as justification for how another game works. The sole exceptions to this, are games that share middle-ware such as Havok or Unreal Technology. There are certain programming functions that can be used to say “Well if it was bad in this game, it can’t be better in this other game.” But I digress. The point here is, regardless of what The Beatles meant to millions and millions of people, Kurt had the same effect on his fair share of fans alike. The thing to take away from that, is TB:RB stands as a testament to The Beatles and their work. GH5, however, does NOT stand as a testament to Kurt Cobain and what he did, and meant, to a lot of people.

Guitar Hero 5, as much as it is a music game, it is a tribute TO the music that you can play, rather than any one band or person, like the latest Rock Band, or previous installments of both games (Aerosmith, Metallica for GH, and AC/DC for RB)

The thing that I’m trying to stress here, is that even if we don’t know the exact terms of agreement between the two parties, there is a style element involved here that people are trying to argue against. You can go ahead and rant about how great Kurt Cobain was, and how disrespectful it is to see him singing a Bon Jovi song, that’s fine. But until you realize that the way Guitar Hero was designed from all the way back at Guitar Hero 1 was to allow stuff like this to happen, you’re not gonna get anywhere, except for down farther and farther in the hole you are digging yourself.

Me? I’m not completely neutral on this point of view, obviously, but as far as I care about stuff like this, I’m just gonna enjoy both games, and be glad that the developers choose to recognize people who made a difference within the music world. Because honestly, since when was that not enough?